16GB · AI Score 4.3/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads
4.3 AI Score ✓ Measured
Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super delivers about 119.63 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 16GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 4.45 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 6 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 16GB at the tested precision, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, FLUX.1-dev, FLUX.1 Kontext and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.
The 16GB actually changes this card's story: only 6 of 12 workloads gated instead of 8, and it never got near its 285W rating (I peaked it at 250W). The Z-Image and LTX video runs were my noisiest on this card, which makes sense, those sit right at the VRAM edge. Quick note on the setup: all my AI benchmarking was done on rented cloud GPUs, I used all three of Vast.ai, RunPod and Modal depending on which had the card, and they all have their pros and cons. Same pinned harness on every run, and everything here got double-checked before it went up.
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B | 187.75 tok/s | 2.7 GB peak159 W59°C1.18 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 119.63 tok/s | 4.6 GB peak191 W61°C0.63 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B | 65.89 tok/s | 8.6 GB peak201 W65°C0.33 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen3 32B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable Diffusion XL | 8.9 images/min | 14.6 GB peak247 W69°C6.8 s/img | ✓ Measured |
| Z-Image Turbo | 1.65 images/min | 14.1 GB peak126 W69°C37.1 s/img | ✓ Measured |
| FLUX.1 dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen-Image-Edit | ✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-Video (distilled) | 2.17 frames/s | 9.2 GB peak152 W70°C44.8 s/clip | ✓ Measured |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) | ✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) |
| CUDA cores | 8,448 |
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 256-bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W |
| Process | 4nm |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Release date | 2024-01-24 |
| Launch MSRP | $799 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super scores 4.3/100, #51 of 102. It ran 6 of 12; 6 exceeded its 16GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.
100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #16 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.
| GPU | Relative | % | AI Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5080 | 114% | 4.9 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | 109% | 4.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 109% | 4.7 | |
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | 102% | 4.4 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | 100% | 4.3 | |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | 86% | 3.7 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | 81% | 3.5 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 81% | 3.5 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT | 79% | 3.4 |
Same card, other workloads: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Gaming benchmarks
← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings
| Transistors | 45,900 million |
| Die size | 378.6 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm |
| Fabricated by | TSMC |
| Transistor density | 121.2 million per mm² |
Denser than 87% of the 76 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.
Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.
Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.
| Workflow | Time | Energy | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 50.72 Wh | measured |
Can't run: 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film, narrated (needs Qwen3 32B), 10 short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 40-product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), 20 long-form articles (needs Llama 3.3 70B), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), 100-photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 100-photo restore and enlarge (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev).