16GB · AI Score 3.2/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads
3.2 AI Score ✓ Measured
Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti delivers about 57.09 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 16GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 2.29 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 6 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 16GB at the tested precision, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, FLUX.1-dev, FLUX.1 Kontext and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.
Important: this is the 16GB SKU, I say that everywhere because the 8GB version is a different card for AI. The 16GB ran LTX video and Z-Image, stuff even 12GB cards refuse. It did creep to 103% of its 160W rating on SDXL and hit 77°C on video, but for a budget AI card the VRAM does the talking. Quick note on the setup: all my AI benchmarking was done on rented cloud GPUs, I used all three of Vast.ai, RunPod and Modal depending on which had the card, and they all have their pros and cons. Same pinned harness on every run, and everything here got double-checked before it went up.
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B | 96.29 tok/s | 2.8 GB peak99 W52°C0.97 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 57.09 tok/s | 4.8 GB peak111 W55°C0.51 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B | 31.12 tok/s | 8.5 GB peak126 W62°C0.25 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen3 32B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable Diffusion XL | 4.58 images/min | 14.5 GB peak161 W75°C13.1 s/img | ✓ Measured |
| Z-Image Turbo | 1.35 images/min | 14 GB peak106 W75°C44.8 s/img | ✓ Measured |
| FLUX.1 dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen-Image-Edit | ✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-Video (distilled) | 1.5 frames/s | 9.1 GB peak117 W77°C64.5 s/clip | ✓ Measured |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) | ✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| CUDA cores | 4,352 |
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,535 MHz |
| TDP | 165 W |
| Process | 4 nm |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Release date | 2023-07-18 |
| Launch MSRP | $499 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 3.2/100, #63 of 102. It ran 6 of 12; 6 exceeded its 16GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.
100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #26 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.
| GPU | Relative | % | AI Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | 103% | 3.3 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | 103% | 3.3 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | 103% | 3.3 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | 103% | 3.3 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | 100% | 3.2 | |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | 100% | 3.2 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | 97% | 3.1 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | 97% | 3.1 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94% | 3 |
Same card, other workloads: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Gaming benchmarks
← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings
| Transistors | 22,900 million |
| Die size | 187.8 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm |
| Fabricated by | TSMC |
| Transistor density | 121.9 million per mm² |
Denser than 95% of the 76 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.
Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.
Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.
| Workflow | Time | Energy | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 32.1 min | 67.32 Wh | measured |
Can't run: 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film, narrated (needs Qwen3 32B), 10 short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 40-product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), 20 long-form articles (needs Llama 3.3 70B), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), 100-photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 100-photo restore and enlarge (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev).