NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AI & Machine Learning Benchmarks & Specs

12GB · AI Score 3.5/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads

3.5 AI Score ✓ Measured

Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers about 144.11 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 12GB. 8 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 12GB at the tested precision, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, Z-Image Turbo, FLUX.1-dev and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.

Bench notes: from the person who ran it

This was my hottest run of the whole fleet, 86°C at a flat 350W on the coder model. It'll do the work, but plan cooling around sustained load, not gaming bursts. 12GB gates 8 of 12 workloads. Quick note on the setup: all my AI benchmarking was done on rented cloud GPUs, I used all three of Vast.ai, RunPod and Modal depending on which had the card, and they all have their pros and cons. Same pinned harness on every run, and everything here got double-checked before it went up.

AI & Machine Learning benchmark results

Text Generation tok/s 5

Qwen3 4B206.45
Llama 3.1 8B144.11
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B78.31
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Qwen3 4B206.45 tok/s
2.7 GB peak195 W66°C1.06 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3.1 8B144.11 tok/s
4.9 GB peak275 W73°C0.52 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B78.31 tok/s
8.7 GB peak305 W86°C0.26 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 32B✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Llama 3.3 70B✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Generation images/min 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Z-Image Turbo✕ Won't fit needs ~13 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
FLUX.1 dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Editing images/min 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
FLUX.1 Kontext dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen-Image-Edit✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Video Generation frames/s 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
LTX-Video (distilled)✕ Won't fit needs ~14 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Wan 2.2 5B (720p)✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
How we measured this. Every result comes from our own pinned, reproducible AI suite, 12 workloads: the Qwen3-4B to Llama-70B LLM ladder (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M), SDXL / Z-Image / FLUX-dev generation, FLUX-Kontext / Qwen-Edit editing, and LTX / Wan video, run first-party on rented hardware with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. Peak VRAM, power draw, temperature and tokens-per-watt are captured per workload. “Won’t fit” rows are real data: where a model exceeds the card’s VRAM at the tested precision we record a hard gate rather than silently dropping to a smaller quant. Measured 2026-07-11 · harness 2.0.0-standalone.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti specifications

ArchitectureAmpere (GA102)
CUDA cores10,240
VRAM12GB GDDR6X
Memory bus384-bit
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s
Boost clock1,665 MHz
TDP350 W
Process8nm
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
Release date2021-06-03
Launch MSRP$1,199

Verdict, capable, but 12GB sets the ceiling

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti scores 3.5/100, #55 of 102. It ran 3 of 12; 8 exceeded its 12GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.

Relative performance: where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti lands

100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #19 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.

GPURelative%AI Score
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
126%4.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super
123%4.3
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
106%3.7
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
100%3.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
100%3.5
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
97%3.4
AMD Radeon RX 9070
97%3.4
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
94%3.3
AMD Radeon RX 6800
94%3.3

Same card, other workloads: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming benchmarks

← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings

The silicon

Transistors28,300 million
Die size628.4 mm²
Fabricated bySamsung
Transistor density45 million per mm²

Denser than 49% of the 76 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.

Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.

What this card can build

Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.

WorkflowTimeEnergyBasis
Full codebase review12.8 min64.96 Whmeasured

Can't run: 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film, narrated (needs Qwen3 32B), 10 short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), 20 long-form articles (needs Llama 3.3 70B), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), 100-photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 100-photo restore and enlarge (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev).

Rent or buy?

This card is $1,199 to buy. The cheapest listed rate on RunPod is $0.180/hour, but that is the floor: we budget $0.216/hour, a 20% premium, because idle time, storage and unavailable cheap instances all land on the same bill. At that rate buying wins after 5,551 GPU-hours. Below it you are paying for idle silicon.

How you would use itGPU-hours a yearRental cost a yearTime to break even
2 hours a day, hobby730$1587.6 years
8 hours a day, working on it2,920$6311.9 years
24/7, always-on agent8,760$1,8927.6 months

At hobby usage this card is very unlikely to pay for itself before it is superseded. Rent it. Rental figures include a 20% premium over the cheapest listed rate. Ignores electricity, resale and the fact that a rented card can be a newer one tomorrow.

Rental price

$0.180/hr+0.0% since 2026-08-14low $0.180 · high $0.180

Cheapest of the RunPod and Vast on-demand rates we see, sampled daily. Spot and interruptible pricing runs lower.