20GB · AI Score 4.4/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads
4.4 AI Score Includes estimates
Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) delivers about 66.59 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 20GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 3.28 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 5 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 20GB at the tested precision, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, FLUX.1-dev, FLUX.1 Kontext and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant. NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) isn't a retail purchase for most people. It's rented by the hour. You can run this exact card on RunPod.
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCPM5 2B | 183.38 tok/s | 73 W51°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| LFM2.5 2.6B | 170.15 tok/s | 78 W50°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Granite 4.1 3B | 127.76 tok/s | 82 W59°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | 106.26 tok/s | 88 W54°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen3 4B | 110.18 tok/s | 2.9 GB peak68 W46°C1.63 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 | 75.46 tok/s | 100 W61°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3 8B | 66.88 tok/s | 102 W61°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 66.59 tok/s | 4.8 GB peak82 W55°C0.81 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen3 8B | 65.39 tok/s | 103 W61°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 | 47.48 tok/s | 102 W61°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 58.29 tok/s | 100 W57°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Gemma 4 12B | 42.23 tok/s | 105 W60°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B | 36.34 tok/s | 8.6 GB peak83 W63°C0.44 tok/WQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen3 14B | 36.81 tok/s | 110 W62°CQ4_K_M | ✓ Measured |
| Gemma 4 31B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~22 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | Est. |
| Qwen3 32B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 | 39.51 images/min | 120 W57°C | ✓ Measured |
| Sana 1.6B | 17.96 images/min | 122 W64°C | ✓ Measured |
| Stable Diffusion XL | 6.56 images/min | 14.6 GB peak123 W66°C9.2 s/img | ✓ Measured |
| Playground v2.5 | 4.32 images/min | 124 W76°C | ✓ Measured |
| PixArt-Sigma XL | 10.45 images/min | 123 W69°C | ✓ Measured |
| FLUX.1 dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev | ✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Qwen-Image-Edit | ✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GB | VRAM-gated at this precision | ✓ Measured |
| Workload | Result | Telemetry | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-Video (distilled) | 2.06 frames/s | 9.2 GB peak96 W70°C47.1 s/clip | ✓ Measured CPU offload |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) | 0.18 frames/s | 16.6 GB peak116 W79°C269.7 s/clip | ✓ Measured CPU offload |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 |
| VRAM | 20GB GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory bus | 160-bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,175 MHz |
| TDP | 130 W |
| Process | 4nm |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Release date | 2023-08-09 |
| Launch MSRP | $1,250 |
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) scores 4.4/100, #46 of 102. It ran 6 of 12; 5 exceeded its 20GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.
100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #13 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.
| GPU | Relative | % | AI Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5080 | 118% | 5.2 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | 109% | 4.8 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | 107% | 4.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 107% | 4.7 | |
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | 100% | 4.4 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | 98% | 4.3 | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 84% | 3.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | 84% | 3.7 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 80% | 3.5 |
← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings
| Transistors | 35,800 million |
| Die size | 294.5 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm |
| Fabricated by | TSMC |
| Transistor density | 121.6 million per mm² |
Denser than 94% of the 746 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.
Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.
Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.
| Workflow | Time | Energy | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 27.5 min | 38.11 Wh | measured |
Can't run: Product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Restore and enlarge photos (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), Short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), Long-form article batch (needs Llama 3.3 70B).
This card is $1,250 to buy. The cheapest listed rate on Vast.ai is $0.175/hour, but that is the floor: we budget $0.210/hour, a 20% premium, because idle time, storage and unavailable cheap instances all land on the same bill. At that rate buying wins after 5,952 GPU-hours. Below it you are paying for idle silicon.
| How you would use it | GPU-hours a year | Rental cost a year | Time to break even |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 hours a day, hobby | 730 | $153 | 8.2 years |
| 8 hours a day, working on it | 2,920 | $613 | 2.0 years |
| 24/7, always-on agent | 8,760 | $1,840 | 8.2 months |
At hobby usage this card is very unlikely to pay for itself before it is superseded. Rent it. Rental figures include a 20% premium over the cheapest listed rate. Ignores electricity, resale and the fact that a rented card can be a newer one tomorrow.
Cheapest of the RunPod and Vast on-demand rates we see, sampled daily. Spot and interruptible pricing runs lower.