

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super wins 5 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 54.5% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super leads by 81% (65.89 vs 36.34 tok/s); the closest fight is LTX-Video (distilled) (5% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) runs 6 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 110.18 | +70% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 66.59 | +80% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 36.34 | +81% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 6.56 | +36% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.17 | 2.06 | +5% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0.18 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 27.5 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 1.81x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 2,175 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 130 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $1,250 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2023-08-09 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings