

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins 21 of 31 benchmarks, averaging 14% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where GeForce RTX 5070 Ti leads by 28% (119.63 vs 153.23 tok/s); the closest fight is LTX-Video (distilled) (1% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super runs 36 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 23, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCPM5 2B tok/s | 295.94 | 337.02 | -12% |
| LFM2.5 2.6B tok/s | 290.14 | 335.29 | -13% |
| Granite 4.1 3B tok/s | 212.25 | 229.37 | -7% |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B tok/s | 186.32 | 230.54 | -19% |
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 231.69 | -19% |
| DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 tok/s | 136.19 | 163.53 | -17% |
| Llama 3 8B tok/s | 120.81 | 144.39 | -16% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 153.23 | -22% |
| Qwen3 8B tok/s | 117.39 | 139.27 | -16% |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 tok/s | 86.2 | 110.37 | -22% |
| Ornith 1.5 9B tok/s | 104.04 | 124.91 | -17% |
| Gemma 4 12B tok/s | 74.94 | 88.02 | -15% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 83.44 | -21% |
| Qwen3 14B tok/s | 67.09 | 79.02 | -15% |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 30B A3B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Gemma 4 31B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 images/min | 46.09 | 49.51 | -7% |
| SDXL Turbo images/min | 532.27 | 431.35 | +23% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 2.3 | 2.43 | -5% |
| Sana 1.6B images/min | 22.59 | 26.18 | -14% |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 9.38 | -5% |
| Playground v2.5 images/min | 5.57 | 5.88 | -5% |
| PixArt-Sigma XL images/min | 12.6 | 13.34 | -6% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.773 | 2.795 | -1% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 0 of 1; GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 12 min | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.27x faster | $0.064 vs $0.030 |
Renting by the hour, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | $0.252 |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | $0.149 |
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 1.69x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 45,900M | 45,600M |
| Die size | 378.6 mm² | 378 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 121.2 M/mm² | 120.6 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 896 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 2,452 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $749 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2025-02-20 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · GeForce RTX 5070 Ti full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings