GeForce RTX 5080, AI & Machine Learning Benchmarks & Specs

16GB · AI Score 4.9/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads

5.2 AI Score Includes estimates

Every number on this page is first-party: GeForce RTX 5080 was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) GeForce RTX 5080 delivers about 150.71 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 16GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 4.43 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 6 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 16GB at the tested precision, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, FLUX.1-dev, FLUX.1 Kontext and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.

AI & Machine Learning benchmark results

Text Generation tok/s 24

Llama 3.2 1B726.57
Qwen3 0.6B692.51
LFM2.5 2.6B377.14
MiniCPM5 2B367.12
gpt-oss-20b265.35
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B255.18
Granite 4.1 3B253.62
Qwen3 4B215.89
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5180.65
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B173.53
Qwen2.5-7B173.49
Llama 3 8B158.84
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Qwen3 0.6B692.51 tok/s
57 W54°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3.2 1B726.57 tok/s
88 W63°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
MiniCPM5 2B367.12 tok/s
126 W45°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
LFM2.5 2.6B377.14 tok/s
132 W47°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Granite 4.1 3B253.62 tok/s
121 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B255.18 tok/s
138 W46°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 4B215.89 tok/s
2.8 GB peak86 W53°C2.51 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5180.65 tok/s
182 W51°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-7B173.49 tok/s
186 W67°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B173.53 tok/s
190 W68°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3 8B158.84 tok/s
184 W52°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3.1 8B150.71 tok/s
4.7 GB peak144 W56°C1.05 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 8B153.89 tok/s
178 W51°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron Nano 9B v2119.94 tok/s
181 W50°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Ornith 1.5 9B138.12 tok/s
180 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Gemma 4 12B96.61 tok/s
193 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B81.97 tok/s
8.7 GB peak146 W59°C0.56 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 14B87.02 tok/s
209 W54°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
gpt-oss-20b265.35 tok/s
115 W64°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Gemma 4 26B A4B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 30B A3B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Gemma 4 31B✕ Won't fit needs ~22 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 32B✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Llama 3.3 70B✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Generation images/min 9

SDXL Turbo512.76
Stable Diffusion 1.561.19
Sana 1.6B30.02
PixArt-Sigma XL16.22
Stable Diffusion XL12.24
Playground v2.57.6
Z-Image Turbo3.56
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Stable Diffusion 1.561.19 images/min
276 W56°C
✓ Measured
SDXL Turbo512.76 images/min
83 W46°C
✓ Measured
Stable Diffusion XL12.24 images/min
313 W77°C
✓ Measured
Z-Image Turbo3.56 images/min
197 W67°C
✓ Measured
3 hosts ±11%
Sana 1.6B30.02 images/min
310 W56°C
✓ Measured
Playground v2.57.6 images/min
309 W60°C
✓ Measured
PixArt-Sigma XL16.22 images/min
276 W56°C
✓ Measured
FLUX.2 klein 4B✕ Won't fit needs ~19 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
FLUX.1 dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Editing images/min 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
FLUX.1 Kontext dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen-Image-Edit✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image to Video clips/min 5

LTX-Video (image to video)2.389
Stable Video Diffusion1.673
Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B (image to video)0.959
Stable Video Diffusion XT0.935
CogVideoX-5B I2V0.257
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Stable Video Diffusion1.67 clips/min
329 W66°C
✓ Measured
LTX-Video (image to video)2.39 clips/min
193 W59°C
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±11% · CPU offload
Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B (image to video)0.96 clips/min
239 W61°C
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±7% · CPU offload
Stable Video Diffusion XT0.94 clips/min
280 W60°C
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±0% · CPU offload
CogVideoX-5B I2V0.26 clips/min
239 W57°C
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±2% · CPU offload

Video Generation frames/s 4

LTX-Video (distilled)4.331
Wan 2.1 1.3B0.452
CogVideoX-2B0.361
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Wan 2.1 1.3B0.45 frames/s
253 W71°C106.9 s/clip
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±1% · CPU offload
CogVideoX-2B0.36 frames/s
281 W72°C134.9 s/clip
✓ Measured
2 hosts ±1% · CPU offload
LTX-Video (distilled)4.33 frames/s
217 W71°C22.4 s/clip
✓ Measured
3 hosts ±8% · CPU offload
Wan 2.2 5B (720p)✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
How we measured this. Every result comes from our own pinned, reproducible AI suite, 12 workloads: the Qwen3-4B to Llama-70B LLM ladder (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M), SDXL / Z-Image / FLUX-dev generation, FLUX-Kontext / Qwen-Edit editing, and LTX / Wan video, run first-party on rented hardware with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. Peak VRAM, power draw, temperature and tokens-per-watt are captured per workload. “Won’t fit” rows are real data: where a model exceeds the card’s VRAM at the tested precision we record a hard gate rather than silently dropping to a smaller quant. Measured 2026-07-11 · harness 2.0.0-standalone.

GeForce RTX 5080 specifications

ArchitectureBlackwell (GB203)
CUDA cores10,752
VRAM16GB GDDR7
Memory bus256-bit
Memory bandwidth960 GB/s
Boost clock2,617 MHz
TDP360 W
Process5nm
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16
Release date2025-01-30
Launch MSRP$999

Verdict, capable, but 16GB sets the ceiling

GeForce RTX 5080 scores 4.9/100, #39 of 102. It ran 6 of 12; 6 exceeded its 16GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.

Relative performance: where the GeForce RTX 5080 lands

100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #9 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.

GPURelative%AI Score
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
204%10.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
163%8.5
NVIDIA Titan RTX
158%8.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
148%7.7
GeForce RTX 5080
100%5.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
92%4.8
GeForce RTX 4080 Super
90%4.7
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
90%4.7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
85%4.4

Same card, other workloads: GeForce RTX 5080 Gaming benchmarks

← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings

The silicon

Transistors45,600 million
Die size378 mm²
Process node4 nm
Fabricated byTSMC
Transistor density120.6 million per mm²

Denser than 92% of the 746 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.

Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.

What this card can build

Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.

WorkflowTimeEnergyBasis
Full codebase review12.2 min29.75 Whmeasured
Animate a batch of images20.9 min83.14 Whmeasured

Can't run: Product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Restore and enlarge photos (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), Short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), Long-form article batch (needs Llama 3.3 70B).

Rent or buy?

This card is $999 to buy. The cheapest listed rate on Vast.ai is $0.223/hour, but that is the floor: we budget $0.268/hour, a 20% premium, because idle time, storage and unavailable cheap instances all land on the same bill. At that rate buying wins after 3,733 GPU-hours. Below it you are paying for idle silicon.

How you would use itGPU-hours a yearRental cost a yearTime to break even
2 hours a day, hobby730$1955.1 years
8 hours a day, working on it2,920$7811.3 years
24/7, always-on agent8,760$2,3445.1 months

At hobby usage this card is very unlikely to pay for itself before it is superseded. Rent it. Rental figures include a 20% premium over the cheapest listed rate. Ignores electricity, resale and the fact that a rented card can be a newer one tomorrow.

Rental price

$0.223/hr+55.9% since 2026-08-14low $0.084 · high $0.268

Cheapest of the RunPod and Vast on-demand rates we see, sampled daily. Spot and interruptible pricing runs lower.