

NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) wins 6 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 25.7% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) leads by 43% (4.58 vs 6.56 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (14% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) runs 6 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 96.29 | 110.18 | -13% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 57.09 | 66.59 | -14% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 31.12 | 36.34 | -14% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 4.58 | 6.56 | -30% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 1.5 | 2.06 | -27% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0.18 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 32.1 min | 27.5 min | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) 1.17x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,535 MHz | 2,175 MHz |
| TDP | 165 W | 130 W |
| Launch MSRP | $499 | $1,250 |
| Release | 2023-07-18 | 2023-08-09 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB full review · NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings