

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super wins 6 of 12 benchmarks, averaging 79.6% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super leads by 112% (31.12 vs 65.89 tok/s); the closest fight is Z-Image Turbo (22% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 96.29 | 187.75 | -49% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 57.09 | 119.63 | -52% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 31.12 | 65.89 | -53% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 4.58 | 8.9 | -49% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 1.35 | 1.65 | -18% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 1.5 | 2.17 | -31% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 32.1 min | 15.2 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 2.12x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 22,900M | 45,900M |
| Die size | 187.8 mm² | 378.6 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 121.9 M/mm² | 121.2 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace (AD103) |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,535 MHz | 2,610 MHz |
| TDP | 165 W | 285 W |
| Launch MSRP | $499 | $799 |
| Release | 2023-07-18 | 2024-01-24 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB full review · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings