NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AI & Machine Learning Benchmarks & Specs

10GB · AI Score 2.3/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads

2.3 AI Score Includes estimates

Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers about 125.85 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 10GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 2.38 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 9 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 10GB at the tested precision, Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, Z-Image Turbo and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.

Bench notes: from the person who ran it

The 3080 sat at exactly its 320W limit on Llama 8B, it uses everything it's given. The thing that surprised me is how little the 10GB buys you over the 8GB cards for AI: still 8 of 12 workloads gated. One run (Qwen2.5-Coder 14B) came back as a fail that shouldn't have been, so that one's flagged until I re-run it. Quick note on the setup: all my AI benchmarking was done on rented cloud GPUs, I used all three of Vast.ai, RunPod and Modal depending on which had the card, and they all have their pros and cons. Same pinned harness on every run, and everything here got double-checked before it went up.

AI & Machine Learning benchmark results

Text Generation tok/s 19

LFM2.5 2.6B279.55
MiniCPM5 2B272.23
Granite 4.1 3B204.19
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B189.44
Qwen3 4B184.08
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5141.63
Llama 3.1 8B125.85
Llama 3 8B125.8
Qwen3 8B120.85
Ornith 1.5 9B107.51
Nemotron Nano 9B v291.15
Gemma 4 12B76.61
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
MiniCPM5 2B272.23 tok/s
180 W46°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
LFM2.5 2.6B279.55 tok/s
177 W44°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Granite 4.1 3B204.19 tok/s
184 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B189.44 tok/s
189 W46°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 4B184.08 tok/s
2.9 GB peak190 W63°C0.97 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5141.63 tok/s
204 W48°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3 8B125.8 tok/s
205 W48°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3.1 8B125.85 tok/s
4.9 GB peak250 W66°C0.5 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 8B120.85 tok/s
205 W48°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron Nano 9B v291.15 tok/s
210 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Ornith 1.5 9B107.51 tok/s
207 W48°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Gemma 4 12B76.61 tok/s
214 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B✕ Won't fit needs ~12 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen3 14B71.02 tok/s
221 W49°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Gemma 4 26B A4B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 30B A3B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Gemma 4 31B✕ Won't fit needs ~22 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 32B✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Llama 3.3 70B✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Generation images/min 4

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Stable Diffusion XL4.76 images/min
9.1 GB peak268 W71°C12.6 s/img
✓ Measured
CPU offload
Z-Image Turbo✕ Won't fit needs ~13 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
PixArt-Sigma XL✕ Won't fit needs ~14 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
FLUX.1 dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Editing images/min 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
FLUX.1 Kontext dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen-Image-Edit✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Video Generation frames/s 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
LTX-Video (distilled)✕ Won't fit needs ~14 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Wan 2.2 5B (720p)✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
How we measured this. Every result comes from our own pinned, reproducible AI suite, 12 workloads: the Qwen3-4B to Llama-70B LLM ladder (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M), SDXL / Z-Image / FLUX-dev generation, FLUX-Kontext / Qwen-Edit editing, and LTX / Wan video, run first-party on rented hardware with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. Peak VRAM, power draw, temperature and tokens-per-watt are captured per workload. “Won’t fit” rows are real data: where a model exceeds the card’s VRAM at the tested precision we record a hard gate rather than silently dropping to a smaller quant. Measured 2026-07-11 · harness 2.0.0-standalone.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 specifications

ArchitectureAmpere (GA102)
CUDA cores8,704
VRAM10GB GDDR6X
Memory bus320-bit
Memory bandwidth760 GB/s
Boost clock1,710 MHz
TDP320 W
Process8nm
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
Release date2020-09-17
Launch MSRP$699

Verdict, capable, but 10GB sets the ceiling

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 2.3/100, #74 of 102. It ran 3 of 12; 9 exceeded its 10GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.

Relative performance: where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 lands

100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #35 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.

GPURelative%AI Score
AMD Radeon RX 6800
100%2.3
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
100%2.3
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
100%2.3
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
100%2.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
100%2.3
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
100%2.3
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
96%2.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
96%2.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
96%2.2

Same card, other workloads: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming benchmarks

← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings

The silicon

Transistors28,300 million
Die size628.4 mm²
Process node8 nm
Fabricated bySamsung
Transistor density45 million per mm²

Denser than 81% of the 746 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.

Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.

What this card can build

Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.

Can't run: Product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Restore and enlarge photos (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), Short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), Long-form article batch (needs Llama 3.3 70B), Full codebase review (needs Qwen2.5-Coder 14B).

Rent or buy?

This card is $699 to buy. The cheapest listed rate on Vast.ai is $0.109/hour, but that is the floor: we budget $0.131/hour, a 20% premium, because idle time, storage and unavailable cheap instances all land on the same bill. At that rate buying wins after 5,344 GPU-hours. Below it you are paying for idle silicon.

How you would use itGPU-hours a yearRental cost a yearTime to break even
2 hours a day, hobby730$957.3 years
8 hours a day, working on it2,920$3821.8 years
24/7, always-on agent8,760$1,1467.3 months

At hobby usage this card is very unlikely to pay for itself before it is superseded. Rent it. Rental figures include a 20% premium over the cheapest listed rate. Ignores electricity, resale and the fact that a rented card can be a newer one tomorrow.

Rental price

$0.109/hr+75.8% since 2026-08-14low $0.029 · high $0.162

Cheapest of the RunPod and Vast on-demand rates we see, sampled daily. Spot and interruptible pricing runs lower.