NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, AI & Machine Learning Benchmarks & Specs

8GB · AI Score 2.0/100 · first-party measured on 12 AI workloads

2 AI Score Includes estimates

Every number on this page is first-party: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was run on our pinned 12-workload AI suite on 2026-07-11, with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. On Llama 3.1 8B (Q4_K_M) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers about 76.93 tokens/sec. Llama 3.3 70B does not fit. It needs roughly 42GB and this card has 8GB. For image generation, SDXL runs at 1.1 it/s, while FLUX.1-dev won't fit at BF16 (needs ~26GB). 9 of the 12 workloads won't fit on 8GB at the tested precision, Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, Qwen3 32B, Llama 3.3 70B, Z-Image Turbo and others. We publish those as hard gates rather than quietly dropping to a smaller quant.

Bench notes: from the person who ran it

The 3060 Ti is basically a lesson in what 8GB means in 2026, 9 of my 12 workloads wouldn't even load. What it does run, it runs hot: SDXL pushed it to 81°C at 99% of its 200W rating, and that was also my noisiest run on this card. If you're buying for AI, the 8GB is the whole story. Quick note on the setup: all my AI benchmarking was done on rented cloud GPUs, I used all three of Vast.ai, RunPod and Modal depending on which had the card, and they all have their pros and cons. Same pinned harness on every run, and everything here got double-checked before it went up.

AI & Machine Learning benchmark results

Text Generation tok/s 19

MiniCPM5 2B205.86
LFM2.5 2.6B198.79
Granite 4.1 3B146.23
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B130.09
Qwen3 4B118.21
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.596.35
Llama 3 8B85.46
Qwen3 8B82.96
Llama 3.1 8B76.93
Ornith 1.5 9B73.84
Nemotron Nano 9B v261.7
Gemma 4 12B52.67
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
MiniCPM5 2B205.86 tok/s
110 W55°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
LFM2.5 2.6B198.79 tok/s
117 W54°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Granite 4.1 3B146.23 tok/s
129 W56°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B130.09 tok/s
125 W56°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 4B118.21 tok/s
2.9 GB peak130 W63°C0.91 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.596.35 tok/s
132 W57°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3 8B85.46 tok/s
135 W57°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Llama 3.1 8B76.93 tok/s
4.8 GB peak145 W67°C0.53 tok/WQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen3 8B82.96 tok/s
137 W57°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Nemotron Nano 9B v261.7 tok/s
140 W58°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Ornith 1.5 9B73.84 tok/s
137 W57°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Gemma 4 12B52.67 tok/s
139 W58°CQ4_K_M
✓ Measured
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B✕ Won't fit needs ~11.5 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen3 14B✕ Won't fit needs ~11 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Gemma 4 26B A4B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 30B A3B✕ Won't fit needs ~20 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Gemma 4 31B✕ Won't fit needs ~22 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Qwen3 32B✕ Won't fit needs ~23 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Llama 3.3 70B✕ Won't fit needs ~46 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Generation images/min 9

SD Turbo327.8
SDXL Turbo201.93
LCM DreamShaper v780.24
Stable Diffusion 1.520.42
Stable Diffusion XL2.2
WorkloadResultTelemetryData
Stable Diffusion 1.520.42 images/min
188 W68°C
✓ Measured
SD Turbo327.8 images/min
82 W53°C
✓ Measured
LCM DreamShaper v780.24 images/min
160 W63°C
✓ Measured
SDXL Turbo201.93 images/min
80 W56°C
✓ Measured
Sana 1.6B✕ Won't fit needs ~11 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
Stable Diffusion XL2.2 images/min
6.5 GB peak151 W81°C27.3 s/img
✓ Measured
CPU offload
Z-Image Turbo✕ Won't fit needs ~13 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
PixArt-Sigma XL✕ Won't fit needs ~14 GBVRAM-gated at this precisionEst.
FLUX.1 dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Image Editing images/min 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
FLUX.1 Kontext dev✕ Won't fit needs ~26 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Qwen-Image-Edit✕ Won't fit needs ~42 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured

Video Generation frames/s 2

WorkloadResultTelemetryData
LTX-Video (distilled)✕ Won't fit needs ~14 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
Wan 2.2 5B (720p)✕ Won't fit needs ~18 GBVRAM-gated at this precision✓ Measured
How we measured this. Every result comes from our own pinned, reproducible AI suite, 12 workloads: the Qwen3-4B to Llama-70B LLM ladder (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M), SDXL / Z-Image / FLUX-dev generation, FLUX-Kontext / Qwen-Edit editing, and LTX / Wan video, run first-party on rented hardware with under 0.5% run-to-run variance. Peak VRAM, power draw, temperature and tokens-per-watt are captured per workload. “Won’t fit” rows are real data: where a model exceeds the card’s VRAM at the tested precision we record a hard gate rather than silently dropping to a smaller quant. Measured 2026-07-11 · harness 2.0.0-standalone.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti specifications

ArchitectureAmpere (GA104)
CUDA cores4,864
VRAM8GB GDDR6
Memory bus256-bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s
Boost clock1,665 MHz
TDP200 W
Process8nm
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
Release date2020-12-02
Launch MSRP$399

Verdict, capable, but 8GB sets the ceiling

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 2.0/100, #86 of 102. It ran 3 of 12; 9 exceeded its 8GB. Every figure here is our own measurement.

Relative performance: where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lands

100% = this card, AI & Machine Learning headline metric (AI Score). #47 of 61 desktop cards in this vertical.

GPURelative%AI Score
Intel Arc B580
105%2.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
100%2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
100%2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
100%2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
100%2
Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition
100%2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
95%1.9
GeForce RTX 4060
95%1.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
95%1.9

Same card, other workloads: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming benchmarks

← All AI & Machine Learning GPU rankings

The silicon

Transistors17,400 million
Die size392.5 mm²
Process node8 nm
Fabricated bySamsung
Transistor density44.3 million per mm²

Denser than 80% of the 746 cards we have silicon data for. Density is the clearest measure of what a process node bought: a card that gained it without growing the die got its speed from the fab rather than the architecture.

Silicon figures from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). Benchmarks on this page are our own. Compare every chip.

What this card can build

Whole-job timings, composed from our measured per-model results on this card.

Can't run: Product photo shoot (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Photo restoration batch (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Restore and enlarge photos (needs FLUX.1 Kontext dev), Character sheet, 12 poses (needs FLUX.1 dev), Short social clips (needs Qwen3 32B), 60-second AI short film (needs Qwen3 32B), 24-frame storyboard (needs Qwen3 32B), 6-panel comic page (needs Qwen3 32B), Long-form article batch (needs Llama 3.3 70B), Full codebase review (needs Qwen2.5-Coder 14B).

Rent or buy?

This card is $399 to buy. The cheapest listed rate on Vast.ai is $0.075/hour, but that is the floor: we budget $0.090/hour, a 20% premium, because idle time, storage and unavailable cheap instances all land on the same bill. At that rate buying wins after 4,433 GPU-hours. Below it you are paying for idle silicon.

How you would use itGPU-hours a yearRental cost a yearTime to break even
2 hours a day, hobby730$666.1 years
8 hours a day, working on it2,920$2631.5 years
24/7, always-on agent8,760$7886.1 months

At hobby usage this card is very unlikely to pay for itself before it is superseded. Rent it. Rental figures include a 20% premium over the cheapest listed rate. Ignores electricity, resale and the fact that a rented card can be a newer one tomorrow.

Rental price

$0.075/hr+33.9% since 2026-09-30low $0.052 · high $0.149

Cheapest of the RunPod and Vast on-demand rates we see, sampled daily. Spot and interruptible pricing runs lower.