NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) vs NVIDIA RTX A5000, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A5000 wins 7 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 48.7% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA RTX A5000 leads by 80% (66.59 vs 119.86 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (14% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A5000 runs 8 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 110.18 | 171.68 | -36% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 66.59 | 119.86 | -44% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 36.34 | 64.89 | -44% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 30.49 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.56 | 7.46 | -12% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.06 | 2.7 | -24% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.18 | 0.24 | -25% |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A5000 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 27.5 min | 15.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A5000 1.79x faster | $0.092 vs $0.041 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX A5000 finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
Cost to rent
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | $0.200 |
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | $0.160 |
NVIDIA RTX A5000 is 1.25x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 20GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere (GA102 derivative) |
| Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,175 MHz | 1,695 MHz |
| TDP | 130 W | 230 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,250 | $2,250 |
| Release | 2023-08-09 | 2021-04-12 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) or NVIDIA RTX A5000?
- NVIDIA RTX A5000 performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 7 of 11 benchmarks in our suite with an average 48.7% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) and NVIDIA RTX A5000?
- NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) has 20GB VRAM and a 130W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX A5000 has 24GB VRAM and a 230W TDP.
- Does VRAM matter more than speed between NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) and NVIDIA RTX A5000?
- For AI, yes, NVIDIA RTX A5000 fits 1 more of our 12 workloads than NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation). A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) and NVIDIA RTX A5000?
- Llama 3.1 8B: NVIDIA RTX A5000 leads by roughly 80% (66.59 vs 119.86 tok/s) in our testing.
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) full review · NVIDIA RTX A5000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings