GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation), AI & Machine Learning Comparison

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
vs
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti wins 14 of 27 benchmarks, averaging 3.1% faster.

Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.

What the numbers say

The gap is widest in PixArt-Sigma XL, where NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) leads by 70% (6.16 vs 10.45 images/min); the closest fight is Granite 4.1 3B (2% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) runs 38 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 21, models that don't fit score zero.

Benchmark results head-to-head

BenchmarkGeForce RTX 5060 TiNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)Difference
MiniCPM5 2B tok/s200.58183.38+9%
LFM2.5 2.6B tok/s188.2170.15+11%
Granite 4.1 3B tok/s130.68127.76+2%
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B tok/s128.01106.26+20%
Qwen3 4B tok/s134.96110.18+22%
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 tok/s87.2175.46+16%
Llama 3 8B tok/s78.5166.88+17%
Llama 3.1 8B tok/s84.266.59+26%
Qwen3 8B tok/s76.6365.39+17%
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 tok/s58.9847.48+24%
Ornith 1.5 9B tok/s68.9658.29+18%
Gemma 4 12B tok/s48.6642.23+15%
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s45.0636.34+24%
Qwen3 14B tok/s41.9336.81+14%
Gemma 4 31B tok/s00n/a
Qwen3 32B tok/s00n/a
Llama 3.3 70B tok/s00n/a
Stable Diffusion 1.5 images/min25.1439.51-36%
Sana 1.6B images/min12.6417.96-30%
Stable Diffusion XL images/min5.226.56-20%
Playground v2.5 images/min2.934.32-32%
PixArt-Sigma XL images/min6.1610.45-41%
FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min00n/a
FLUX.1 dev images/min00n/a
Qwen-Image-Edit images/min00n/a
LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s1.7142.06-17%
Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s00.18n/a

Whole-job comparison

How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) on 0.

WorkflowGeForce RTX 5060 TiNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)DifferenceCost per run
Full codebase review22.2 min27.5 minGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 1.24x faster$0.045 vs $0.092

Renting by the hour, GeForce RTX 5060 Ti finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.

Cost to rent

CardPer hour
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti$0.121
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)$0.200

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is 1.65x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.

Specifications compared

GeForce RTX 5060 TiNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
VRAM16GB20GB
Transistors21,900M35,800M
Die size181 mm²294.5 mm²
Process node4 nm4 nm
Transistor density121 M/mm²121.6 M/mm²
ArchitectureBlackwellAda Lovelace
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s360 GB/s
Boost clock2,572 MHz2,175 MHz
TDP180 W130 W
Launch MSRP$429$1,250
Release2025-04-162023-08-09

FAQ

Which is better for ai & machine learning: GeForce RTX 5060 Ti or NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 14 of 27 benchmarks in our suite with an average 3.1% advantage.
What are the main hardware differences between GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has 16GB VRAM and a 180W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) has 20GB VRAM and a 130W TDP.
Does VRAM matter more than speed between GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
For AI, yes, NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) fits 4 more of our 12 workloads than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti. A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
Where is the biggest performance difference between GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
PixArt-Sigma XL: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) leads by roughly 70% (6.16 vs 10.45 images/min) in our testing.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti full review · NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings