GeForce RTX 4080 Super vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation), AI & Machine Learning Comparison

GeForce RTX 4080 Super
GeForce RTX 4080 Super
vs
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)

GeForce RTX 4080 Super wins 20 of 27 benchmarks, averaging 76.7% faster.

Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.

What the numbers say

The gap is widest in Qwen3 14B, where GeForce RTX 4080 Super leads by 98% (72.96 vs 36.81 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion 1.5 (32% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) runs 22 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 21, models that don't fit score zero.

Benchmark results head-to-head

BenchmarkGeForce RTX 4080 SuperNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)Difference
MiniCPM5 2B tok/s311.94183.38+70%
LFM2.5 2.6B tok/s308.63170.15+81%
Granite 4.1 3B tok/s227.06127.76+78%
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B tok/s200.69106.26+89%
Qwen3 4B tok/s197.53110.18+79%
DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 tok/s146.9875.46+95%
Llama 3 8B tok/s130.5366.88+95%
Llama 3.1 8B tok/s126.2966.59+90%
Qwen3 8B tok/s126.3965.39+93%
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 tok/s93.4347.48+97%
Ornith 1.5 9B tok/s111.658.29+91%
Gemma 4 12B tok/s80.5742.23+91%
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s70.5536.34+94%
Qwen3 14B tok/s72.9636.81+98%
Gemma 4 31B tok/s00n/a
Qwen3 32B tok/s00n/a
Llama 3.3 70B tok/s00n/a
Stable Diffusion 1.5 images/min51.9639.51+32%
Stable Diffusion XL images/min11.546.56+76%
Sana 1.6B images/min26.9817.96+50%
Playground v2.5 images/min6.744.32+56%
PixArt-Sigma XL images/min14.5910.45+40%
FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min00n/a
FLUX.1 dev images/min00n/a
Qwen-Image-Edit images/min00n/a
LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s2.8532.06+38%
Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s00.18n/a

Whole-job comparison

How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. GeForce RTX 4080 Super is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) on 0.

WorkflowGeForce RTX 4080 SuperNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)DifferenceCost per run
Full codebase review14.2 min27.5 minGeForce RTX 4080 Super 1.94x faster$0.052 vs $0.092

Renting by the hour, GeForce RTX 4080 Super finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.

Cost to rent

CardPer hour
GeForce RTX 4080 Super$0.222
NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)$0.200

NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) is 1.11x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.

Specifications compared

GeForce RTX 4080 SuperNVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)
VRAM16GB20GB
Transistors45,900M35,800M
Die size378.6 mm²294.5 mm²
Process node4 nm4 nm
Transistor density121.2 M/mm²121.6 M/mm²
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
Memory bandwidth736 GB/s360 GB/s
Boost clock2,505 MHz2,175 MHz
TDP320 W130 W
Launch MSRP$999$1,250
Release2024-01-312023-08-09

FAQ

Which is better for ai & machine learning: GeForce RTX 4080 Super or NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
GeForce RTX 4080 Super performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 20 of 27 benchmarks in our suite with an average 76.7% advantage.
What are the main hardware differences between GeForce RTX 4080 Super and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
GeForce RTX 4080 Super has 16GB VRAM and a 320W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) has 20GB VRAM and a 130W TDP.
Does VRAM matter more than speed between GeForce RTX 4080 Super and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
For AI, yes, NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) fits 3 more of our 12 workloads than GeForce RTX 4080 Super. A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
Where is the biggest performance difference between GeForce RTX 4080 Super and NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation)?
Qwen3 14B: GeForce RTX 4080 Super leads by roughly 98% (72.96 vs 36.81 tok/s) in our testing.

GeForce RTX 4080 Super full review · NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings