

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super wins 5 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 27.9% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super leads by 30% (50.74 vs 65.89 tok/s); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (25% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super runs 6 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 149.68 | 187.75 | -20% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 93.16 | 119.63 | -22% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 50.74 | 65.89 | -23% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 1.65 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 0 | 2.17 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 19.7 min | 15.2 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 1.30x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 35,800M | 45,900M |
| Die size | 294.5 mm² | 378.6 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 121.6 M/mm² | 121.2 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace (AD103) |
| Memory bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,475 MHz | 2,610 MHz |
| TDP | 200 W | 285 W |
| Launch MSRP | $599 | $799 |
| Release | 2023-04-13 | 2024-01-24 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 full review · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings