

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super wins 5 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 88.1% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super leads by 267% (1.65 vs 0.45 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (41% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 7 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 127.01 | +48% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 84.68 | +41% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 46.74 | +41% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 21.98 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 6.18 | +44% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 1.65 | 0.45 | +267% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0.171 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 21.4 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 1.41x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $9,999 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2018-08-27 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings