

NVIDIA H200 wins 12 of 12 benchmarks, averaging 444.2% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA H200 leads by 1305% (1.65 vs 23.175 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (70% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA H200 runs 150 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 318.84 | -41% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 268.31 | -55% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 148.43 | -56% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 76.58 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 42.66 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 37.16 | -76% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 1.65 | 23.175 | -93% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 9.514 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 4.393 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 3.76 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.17 | 17.87 | -88% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 1.41 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA H200 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 6.7 min | NVIDIA H200 2.25x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 141GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Hopper |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 4800 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 1,980 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 700 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $31,000 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2024-03-18 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · NVIDIA H200 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings