

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super wins 23 of 32 benchmarks, averaging 61.7% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in PixArt-Sigma XL, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super leads by 105% (12.6 vs 6.16 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (39% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super runs 38 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 23, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCPM5 2B tok/s | 295.94 | 200.58 | +48% |
| LFM2.5 2.6B tok/s | 290.14 | 188.2 | +54% |
| Granite 4.1 3B tok/s | 212.25 | 130.68 | +62% |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B tok/s | 186.32 | 128.01 | +46% |
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 134.96 | +39% |
| DeepSeek Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 tok/s | 136.19 | 87.21 | +56% |
| Llama 3 8B tok/s | 120.81 | 78.51 | +54% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 84.2 | +42% |
| Qwen3 8B tok/s | 117.39 | 76.63 | +53% |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 tok/s | 86.2 | 58.98 | +46% |
| Ornith 1.5 9B tok/s | 104.04 | 68.96 | +51% |
| Gemma 4 12B tok/s | 74.94 | 48.66 | +54% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 45.06 | +46% |
| Qwen3 14B tok/s | 67.09 | 41.93 | +60% |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 30B A3B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Gemma 4 31B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 images/min | 46.09 | 25.14 | +83% |
| SDXL Turbo images/min | 532.27 | 260.84 | +104% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 2.3 | 1.56 | +47% |
| Sana 1.6B images/min | 22.59 | 12.64 | +79% |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 5.22 | +70% |
| DreamShaper XL Turbo images/min | 30.49 | 18.31 | +67% |
| Playground v2.5 images/min | 5.57 | 2.93 | +90% |
| PixArt-Sigma XL images/min | 12.6 | 6.16 | +105% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.773 | 1.714 | +62% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 1 of 1; GeForce RTX 5060 Ti on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 22.2 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 1.46x faster | $0.064 vs $0.045 |
Renting by the hour, GeForce RTX 5060 Ti finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | $0.252 |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | $0.121 |
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is 2.08x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 45,900M | 21,900M |
| Die size | 378.6 mm² | 181 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 121.2 M/mm² | 121 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 2,572 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 180 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $429 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2025-04-16 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · GeForce RTX 5060 Ti full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings