

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 wins 6 of 12 benchmarks, averaging 22.9% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 55% (1.65 vs 2.55 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder 14B (6% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 187.75 | 201.76 | -7% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 119.63 | 127.09 | -6% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 65.89 | 69.93 | -6% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 8.9 | 10.16 | -12% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 1.65 | 2.55 | -35% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 2.17 | 3.23 | -33% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 15.2 min | 14.3 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 1.06x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 45,900M | 45,900M |
| Die size | 378.6 mm² | 378.6 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 121.2 M/mm² | 121.2 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (AD103) | Ada Lovelace (AD103) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,610 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 320 W |
| Launch MSRP | $799 | $1,199 |
| Release | 2024-01-24 | 2022-11-16 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super full review · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings