

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB wins 5 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 27.5% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen3 4B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 36% (96.29 vs 70.88 tok/s); the closest fight is LTX-Video (distilled) (8% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 96.29 | 70.88 | +36% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 57.09 | 43.08 | +33% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 31.12 | 23.35 | +33% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 4.58 | 3.58 | +28% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 1.5 | 1.39 | +8% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 32.1 min | 42.8 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB 1.33x faster |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,535 MHz | 2,130 MHz |
| TDP | 165 W | 70 W |
| Launch MSRP | $499 | $625 |
| Release | 2023-07-18 | 2024-02-12 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB full review · NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings