

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 60.4% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 125% (4.76 vs 10.7 images/min); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (25% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 184.08 | 241.33 | -24% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 125.85 | 157.89 | -20% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 0 | 87.51 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 39.87 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 18.4 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 4.76 | 10.7 | -56% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 5.1 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 2.229 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.029 | n/a |
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | $0.029 |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | $0.740 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 25.52x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 10GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere (GA102) | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 760 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,710 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 320 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $699 | $6,799 |
| Release | 2020-09-17 | 2022-12-03 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 full review · NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings