

Dead heat, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) split our benchmark suite evenly.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 leads by 49% (125.85 vs 84.21 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (25% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 4 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 184.08 | 125.23 | +47% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 125.85 | 84.21 | +49% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 0 | 46.54 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 4.76 | 5.94 | -20% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 10GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ampere (GA102) | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 760 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,710 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 320 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $699 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2020-09-17 | 2018-08-14 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings