

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 5 of 8 benchmarks, averaging -12.2% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti leads by 15% (144.11 vs 124.87 tok/s); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (12% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 3, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 206.45 | 184.34 | +12% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 144.11 | 124.87 | +15% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 78.31 | 68.51 | +14% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 32.18 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 15.73 | n/a |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0 | 5.4 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 2.164 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.05 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A6000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 12.8 min | 14.6 min | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 1.14x faster | $0.038 vs $0.080 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | $0.180 |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | $0.330 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is 1.83x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 12GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere (GA102) | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 912.4 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,665 MHz | 1,860 MHz |
| TDP | 350 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,199 | $4,650 |
| Release | 2021-06-03 | 2020-10-05 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti full review · NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings