SmolLM3 3B · 11 GPUs measured first-party · llama.cpp Q4_K_M · Updated July 2026

What GPU Do You Need for SmolLM3 3B?

SmolLM3 3B is Hugging Face's fully open small model: not just open weights, but published training data and recipe. It's also quietly one of the fastest models in our database: 411 tok/s on the B300, with a ~3GB floor that fits practically any GPU made this decade. Measured on 11 GPUs, llama.cpp Q4_K_M.

Benchmarked weights: bartowski/HuggingFaceTB_SmolLM3-3B-GGUF

411.25tok/s
Fastest: NVIDIA B300
measured, 3-run llama-bench
~3GB
VRAM needed (measured peak)
GPU-independent, applies to every card
11
GPUs measured
same pinned harness
3.07tok/W
Most efficient: NVIDIA H200
real power sampling, not TDP

What GPU Do You Need for SmolLM3 3B?, tok/s, fastest 11

NVIDIA B300
411.25 tok/s
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
406.45 tok/s
NVIDIA H200
402.24 tok/s
NVIDIA B200
400.73 tok/s
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3
397.99 tok/s
NVIDIA L40S
274.16 tok/s
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4
249.76 tok/s
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4
248.05 tok/s
NVIDIA A10G
189.1 tok/s
NVIDIA L4
109.34 tok/s
NVIDIA T4
86.23 tok/s

Measured on our own bench. A card absent from this chart has not been run on this model yet, or cannot fit it.

SmolLM3 3B. Measured generation speed by GPU

NVIDIA B300411.25
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition406.45
NVIDIA H200402.24
NVIDIA B200400.73
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3397.99
NVIDIA L40S274.16
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4249.76
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4248.05
NVIDIA A10G189.1
NVIDIA L4109.34
NVIDIA T486.23
GPUtok/sPrompt t/stok/WAvg power
NVIDIA B300411.2510137.11.48278.1 W
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition406.4520206.12.31175.8 W
NVIDIA H200402.24148593.07131.1 W
NVIDIA B200400.73159141.2334.0 W
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3397.9914732.51.73230.3 W
NVIDIA L40S274.1618018.81.67163.8 W
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4249.767049.92.05122.0 W
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4248.057748.51.96126.3 W
NVIDIA A10G189.17138.11.82103.9 W
NVIDIA L4109.3459301.9456.3 W
NVIDIA T486.232505.61.5655.1 W

What 'fully open' buys you. Most 'open' models publish weights and stop there. SmolLM3 ships the whole pipeline, dataset composition, training code, recipe decisions, which makes it the small model you can audit, reproduce and legally reason about with confidence. For companies with provenance requirements, or anyone fine-tuning who wants to know what's actually in the base, that transparency is a feature no benchmark column captures.

And the benchmarks are real anyway. 411 tok/s peak puts it ahead of every 3-4B rival we've measured on the same silicon (Llama 3.2 3B: 436 is the one exception; Phi-4 Mini: 398; Gemma 3 4B: 301), and the H200's 3.07 tok/W is the best mid-tier efficiency in the small class. With a ~3GB floor, deployment cost rounds to zero: an L4 does 109 tok/s at 56W, a T4 does 86. It competes honestly in the small tier on speed while being the only member you can fully inspect.

Our verdict

SmolLM3 3B: 411 tok/s peak, ~3GB floor, top-tier small-model efficiency, and the only model in our lineup with fully published training data and recipe. If auditability matters to your deployment, it's the obvious small pick; even if it doesn't, the speed stands on its own.

FAQ

What makes SmolLM3 different from other small models?
Full transparency: Hugging Face published the training data, code and recipe, not just weights. It's the only model we benchmark whose complete provenance you can inspect, relevant for compliance-sensitive deployments and informed fine-tuning.
What GPU does it need?
~3GB measured peak at Q4_K_M, any 4GB card fits it. Speed ranges from 411 tok/s (B300) to 86 tok/s on a seven-year-old T4.
How does it compare to Llama 3.2 3B and Phi-4 Mini?
Speed: between them (411 vs Llama's 436 and Phi's 398 tok/s peaks). Quality: competitive for its size, with Phi-4 Mini still our answer-quality pick. Transparency: SmolLM3 alone. Choose by which of the three axes your project values.
What's its efficiency profile?
Excellent: 3.07 tok/W on the H200, the best mid-tier result in our small-model data, and 109 tok/s at 56W on an L4 for cheap sustained serving.
Is it a good fine-tuning base?
One of the best-informed choices available: knowing the training data means knowing what you're building on. The published recipe also makes continued pretraining far less of a guessing game than with closed-data bases.