Sana 1.6B · 24 GPUs measured first-party · text-to-image · Updated October 2026
We ran Sana 1.6B at 1024px on 24 GPUs, from budget cards to datacenter parts, and measured image speed, power draw and peak VRAM on every one. The fastest was NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 at 51.52 images/min.
Benchmarked weights: Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_1024px_diffusers

51.52 images/min on Sana 1.6B, the ceiling. Measured on our bench. 32GB of VRAM, $1,999 at launch.

41.47 images/min on Sana 1.6B, fastest card you can buy at retail. Measured on our bench. 24GB of VRAM, $1,599 at launch.

7.4 images/min on Sana 1.6B, lowest launch price that still fits. Measured on our bench. 12GB of VRAM, $329 at launch.

19.71 images/min on Sana 1.6B, most speed per dollar. Measured on our bench. 12GB of VRAM, $549 at launch. That is 35.9 images/min per $1,000 of launch price.
What GPU Do You Need for Sana 1.6B?, images/min by GPU
Top 15 shown; 9 more cards in the full table below.
Efficiency: images/min per 100W drawn
Top 15 shown; 9 more cards in the full table below.
Power is the average pulled during the run, sampled at 1Hz. The fastest card is often not the one here, and for anything left running this is the number that shows up on the bill.
Value: images/min per $1,000 of MSRP
Top 15 shown; 9 more cards in the full table below.
Launch price, not street price, so it ages. A speed leaderboard always crowns the most expensive card; this is the counterweight.
Sana 1.6B. Measured image speed by GPU
| GPU | Images/min | s per image | img/W·min | Avg power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | 51.52 | 1.165 | 0.094 | 549.2 W |
| NVIDIA L40S | 50.81 | 1.18 | 0.153 | 331.7 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | 41.47 | 1.447 | 0.101 | 411.4 W |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | 30.02 | 1.998 | 0.097 | 310.0 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | 27.92 | 2.149 | 0.115 | 242.6 W |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | 26.98 | 2.224 | 0.124 | 217.3 W |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 26.18 | 2.291 | 0.093 | 282.1 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | 22.59 | 2.657 | 0.107 | 211.0 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 21.84 | 2.747 | 0.059 | 368.8 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 21.64 | 2.773 | 0.094 | 229.3 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | 20.6 | 2.913 | 0.063 | 326.6 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 20.44 | 2.935 | 0.059 | 347.3 W |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | 20.12 | 2.982 | 0.139 | 144.8 W |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | 19.71 | 3.044 | 0.094 | 208.9 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super | 19.35 | 3.1 | 0.095 | 203.0 W |
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | 17.96 | 3.341 | 0.147 | 122.1 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | 16.6 | 3.614 | 0.085 | 196.1 W |
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | 14.18 | 4.232 | 0.102 | 138.9 W |
| NVIDIA A10G | 14.13 | 4.25 | 0.095 | 149.1 W |
| NVIDIA L4 | 13.84 | 4.33 | 0.192 | 72.1 W |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | 12.64 | 4.745 | 0.122 | 103.3 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | 11.91 | 5.04 | 0.085 | 139.6 W |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | 7.4 | 8.113 | 0.053 | 140.2 W |
| NVIDIA T4 | 1.13 | 52.87 | 0.016 | 69.1 W |
What the numbers show. Across 24 GPUs measured on our own bench, RTX 5090 is fastest at 51.5 images/min. L4 is the most efficient, 13.8 images/min at 72W (0.192 images/min per watt). Per dollar of launch price, RTX 5060 Ti gives the most (38.4 images/min per $1,000). The fastest card with 16GB or less is RTX 5080 at 30.0 images/min. The measured peak was ~12GB, so it runs on 12GB cards and up. That floor is a property of the model, so it applies to every GPU, measured or not.
How it compares. L40S: Sana 1.6B 50.81 images/min, FLUX.2 klein 4B 50.29 (4B), Stable Diffusion 1.5 58.54, Swin2SR 4x Upscaler 34.14, PixArt-Sigma XL 26.95. 1 of 4 beat Sana 1.6B here.
Cost on a rented GPU. 1,000 images of Sana 1.6B: $0.081 on a RTX 3060 ($0.036/hr, 2.3 hours), $0.13 on a RTX 5090 ($0.39/hr, 19 min, 1.6x the cost).
Sana 1.6B: cost per 1,000 images on rented GPUs
| GPU | Cheapest rate | Speed (images/min) | Cost per 1,000 images |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | $0.036/hr | 7.4 | $0.081 |
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | $0.078/hr | 14.18 | $0.092 |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | $0.15/hr | 26.18 | $0.095 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | $0.12/hr | 20.6 | $0.099 |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | $0.21/hr | 30.02 | $0.12 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | $0.16/hr | 22.59 | $0.12 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | $0.20/hr | 27.92 | $0.12 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | $0.12/hr | 16.6 | $0.12 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | $0.39/hr | 51.52 | $0.13 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | $0.34/hr | 41.47 | $0.14 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | $0.18/hr | 21.64 | $0.14 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | $0.22/hr | 26.98 | $0.14 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | $0.18/hr | 20.44 | $0.15 |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | $0.19/hr | 19.71 | $0.16 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | $0.20/hr | 20.12 | $0.17 |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | $0.14/hr | 12.64 | $0.18 |
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 (Ada Generation) | $0.20/hr | 17.96 | $0.19 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | $0.27/hr | 21.84 | $0.21 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.79/hr | 50.81 | $0.26 |
| NVIDIA L4 | $0.44/hr | 13.84 | $0.53 |
| NVIDIA T4 | $0.14/hr | 1.13 | $2.01 |
Cheapest hourly rate we track on RunPod and Vast.ai, divided by the measured speed. Startup time and storage are extra.
Speed tiers for Sana 1.6B. 30+ images/min: 4 (RTX 5090, RTX 4090, RTX 5080); 6-30 images/min: 19 (RTX 4080, RTX 4080 Super, RTX 5070 Ti); under 6 images/min: 1 (T4). 30 images/min means two seconds or less per picture.
Time per image. Sana 1.6B at 1024px and 20 steps: 1.2s per image on the RTX 5090, 53.1s on the T4. A batch of 100 takes 2 min on the fastest card and 88 min on the slowest.
VRAM for Sana 1.6B. Measured peak 10.6GB, so 12GB is the smallest common card size; smallest card it ran on: RTX 4070 Ti (12GB).
Power on Sana 1.6B. Most efficient: L4, 72W, 86.8 Wh per 1,000 images. Hungriest: RTX 5090, 549W, 0.18 kWh. At $0.15/kWh: $0.013 per 1,000 images.
Fastest on Sana 1.6B: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, 51.52 images/min. Cheapest consumer card that ran it: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 ($329, 7.4 images/min). Cheapest to rent per job: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, $0.081 per 1,000 images.
Sana 1.6B at 1024px in diffusers, bf16, native precision with no offload, timed over three generations after a warmup, with power and VRAM sampled throughout. Image speed tracks tensor compute and architecture generation more than memory bandwidth, so the order here differs from our LLM boards.