Gemma 3 27B · 10 GPUs measured first-party · llama.cpp Q4_K_M · Updated July 2026

What GPU Do You Need for Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is Google's open flagship: and the model we keep comparing against Mistral Small 24B, because they compete for the same slot in a local stack. Our measurements: 93 tok/s peak on the B300, ~18GB VRAM floor, on the same pinned llama.cpp harness as everything else here.

Benchmarked weights: bartowski/google_gemma-3-27b-it-GGUF

93.44tok/s
Fastest: NVIDIA B300
measured, 3-run llama-bench
~18GB
VRAM needed (measured peak)
GPU-independent, applies to every card
10
GPUs measured
same pinned harness
0.39tok/W
Most efficient: NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3
real power sampling, not TDP

What GPU Do You Need for Gemma 3 27B?, tok/s, fastest 10

NVIDIA B300
93.44 tok/s
NVIDIA B200
86.08 tok/s
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3
84.77 tok/s
NVIDIA H200
84.75 tok/s
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
72.1 tok/s
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM4
48.43 tok/s
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM4
48.17 tok/s
NVIDIA L40S
38.28 tok/s
NVIDIA A10G
26.42 tok/s
NVIDIA L4
14.02 tok/s

Measured on our own bench. A card absent from this chart has not been run on this model yet, or cannot fit it.

Gemma 3 27B. Measured generation speed by GPU

NVIDIA B30093.44
NVIDIA B20086.08
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM384.77
NVIDIA H20084.75
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition72.1
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM448.43
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM448.17
NVIDIA L40S38.28
NVIDIA A10G26.42
NVIDIA L414.02
GPUtok/sPrompt t/stok/WAvg power
NVIDIA B30093.441539.50.29325.9 W
NVIDIA B20086.082969.30.23380.2 W
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM384.772657.40.39216.2 W
NVIDIA H20084.7526360.37226.7 W
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition72.14074.50.32226.0 W
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXM448.431370.70.29169.4 W
NVIDIA A100 40GB SXM448.171369.80.33148.1 W
NVIDIA L40S38.282857.30.2192.2 W
NVIDIA A10G26.421156.40.19141.8 W
NVIDIA L414.02799.90.2360.0 W

The honest head-to-head. Here's our experience, numbers attached: Mistral Small 24B measured 28% faster (119 vs 93 tok/s peak) with a lighter floor (~15GB vs ~18GB), and in day-to-day use we haven't seen output quality from the 27B that overturns that hardware math. Gemma's case rests on what Mistral doesn't have, vision support and stronger multilingual range, plus Google's instruction tuning, which some people prefer. But if your work is English text and code, our advice is to benchmark both against your own prompts before committing the extra VRAM; ours kept landing on the Mistral.

Fit notes. The ~18GB floor is awkward: past every 16GB card, tight on 20GB, comfortable only at 24GB: where it suddenly competes with the dense 32B class (DeepSeek, Qwen, QwQ at ~21GB) and the far faster Qwen3 30B-A3B MoE (309 tok/s). That's the strategic problem this model faces in our lineup: the cards that fit it also fit stronger or faster options. The H100's 85 tok/s at 216W (0.39 tok/W) led efficiency in our runs.

Our verdict

Gemma 3 27B: 93 tok/s peak, ~18GB floor: a solid open flagship that loses its head-to-head with Mistral Small 24B on speed and VRAM in our data, and faces the whole 32B class at 24GB. Its vision and multilingual strengths are real; make sure they're what you're paying the VRAM for.

FAQ

Gemma 3 27B or Mistral Small 24B?
Our measurements: Mistral is 28% faster (119 vs 93 tok/s) and needs less VRAM (~15 vs ~18GB), and our task results favored it too. Gemma wins on vision and multilingual work, if you need those, it's the one; otherwise test both on your prompts.
What GPU does it need?
Realistically 24GB, the ~18GB measured floor rules out 16GB cards and leaves 20GB ones tight. At 24GB, also consider the 32B-class models and the Qwen3 30B MoE that fit the same card.
What is it actually best at?
Multimodal and multilingual breadth at flagship-open scale. It reads images, handles many languages gracefully, and carries Google's instruction polish, a genuinely distinct profile even where raw benchmarks don't lead.
How fast is it on rented hardware?
93 tok/s on the B300, 85 on an H100 at the class-best 0.39 tok/W. At the budget end the A10G's 26 tok/s is patient-single-user territory.
Is Gemma 4 worth waiting for instead?
Gemma 4 12B is already in our database (156 tok/s, ~9GB) and shows the line's newest recipe in the mid size. No 27B-class Gemma 4 has crossed our bench yet; when one does, it gets the same treatment.