

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 250.1% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX A6000 leads by 325% (10.02 vs 2.36 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (172% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 111 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 9, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 184.34 | 67.71 | +172% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 124.87 | 35.01 | +257% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 68.51 | 19.76 | +247% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 32.18 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 15.73 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 10.02 | 2.36 | +325% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.164 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.05 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX A6000 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA T4 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 14.6 min | 50.7 min | NVIDIA RTX A6000 3.47x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,860 MHz | 1,590 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 70 W |
| Launch MSRP | $4,650 | $2,299 |
| Release | 2020-10-05 | 2018-09-13 |
NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · NVIDIA T4 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings