

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 13.6% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX A6000 leads by 22% (5.4 vs 4.425 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (3% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 8, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 184.34 | 179.58 | +3% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 124.87 | 112.36 | +11% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 68.51 | 60.62 | +13% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 32.18 | 27.8 | +16% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 15.73 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 10.02 | 8.56 | +17% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 5.4 | 4.425 | +22% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.164 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.05 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX A6000 is faster on 1 of 2; NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 7.1 min | 6.4 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 1.10x faster |
| Full codebase review | 14.6 min | 16.5 min | NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.13x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,860 MHz | 2,617 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $4,650 | $1,500 |
| Release | 2020-10-05 | 2025-08-01 |
NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings