

NVIDIA RTX A6000 wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 32.2% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX A6000 leads by 54% (6.5 vs 10.02 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (24% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A6000 runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 148.87 | 184.34 | -19% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 100.2 | 124.87 | -20% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 54.29 | 68.51 | -21% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 32.18 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 15.73 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.5 | 10.02 | -35% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 2.164 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 1.05 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX A4500 is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A6000 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 18.4 min | 14.6 min | NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.26x faster | $0.058 vs $0.080 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX A4500 finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 | $0.190 |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | $0.330 |
NVIDIA RTX A4500 is 1.74x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 20GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ampere (workstation variant) | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 640 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,575 MHz | 1,860 MHz |
| TDP | 200 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $1,199 | $4,650 |
| Release | 2021-11-23 | 2020-10-05 |
NVIDIA RTX A4500 full review · NVIDIA RTX A6000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings