

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 50% faster.
NVIDIA Titan RTX's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 63% (10.7 vs 6.56 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 32B (41% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 5, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA Titan RTX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 241.33 | 158.13 | +53% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 157.89 | 107.39 | +47% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 87.51 | 59.75 | +46% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 39.87 | 28.36 | +41% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 18.4 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 10.7 | 6.56 | +63% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.229 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.029 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Titan RTX on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA Titan RTX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 11.4 min | 16.7 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.46x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,505 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 280 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,799 | $2,499 |
| Release | 2022-12-03 | 2018-12-18 |
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA Titan RTX full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings