

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 33.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 44% (87.51 vs 60.62 tok/s); the closest fight is Z-Image Turbo (15% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation runs 9 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 8, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 241.33 | 179.58 | +34% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 157.89 | 112.36 | +41% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 87.51 | 60.62 | +44% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 39.87 | 27.8 | +43% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 18.4 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 10.7 | 8.56 | +25% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 5.1 | 4.425 | +15% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 2.229 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.029 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is faster on 2 of 2; NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 5.5 min | 6.4 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.17x faster |
| Full codebase review | 11.4 min | 16.5 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.44x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,505 MHz | 2,617 MHz |
| TDP | 300 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,799 | $1,500 |
| Release | 2022-12-03 | 2025-08-01 |
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings