NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 7 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 40.1% faster.
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 150% (0.89 vs 2.229 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3-4B (0% apart).
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 242.09 | 241.33 | 0% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 157.15 | 157.89 | -0% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 86.43 | 87.51 | -1% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 40.79 | 39.87 | +2% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 13.5 | 18.4 | -27% |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 9.96 | 10.7 | -7% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0.49 | 1.029 | -52% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0.89 | 2.229 | -60% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 3.24 | 5.1 | -36% |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is faster on 0 of 7; NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation on 7.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 8 min | 5.5 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.47x faster |
| Full codebase review | 11.6 min | 11.4 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.02x faster |
| 6-panel comic page | 19.3 min | 9.3 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 2.08x faster |
| Character sheet, 12 poses | 25.6 min | 12.6 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 2.03x faster |
| Long-form article batch | 34.6 min | 25.4 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.36x faster |
| Product photo shoot | 85.6 min | 43 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.99x faster |
| Photo restoration batch | 3 h 24 min | 1 h 37 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 2.09x faster |
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 48GB |
| Transistors | 76,300M | 76,300M |
| Die size | 608.4 mm² | 608.4 mm² |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 125.4 M/mm² | 125.4 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,460 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 285 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,500 | $6,799 |
| Release | 2024-01-01 | 2022-12-03 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation or NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 7 of 9 benchmarks in our suite with an average 40.1% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation has 48GB VRAM and a 285W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48GB VRAM and a 300W TDP.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- FLUX.1 dev: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by roughly 134% (0.89 vs 2.229 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings