

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation wins 8 of 10 benchmarks, averaging 66.1% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 143% (12.74 vs 5.24 images/min); the closest fight is Llama 3.1 8B (37% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation runs 10 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 170.72 | 116.23 | +47% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 103.18 | 75.52 | +37% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 56.66 | 41.13 | +38% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 25.88 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 12.74 | 5.24 | +143% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 1.286 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0.793 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.32 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 17.6 min | 24.3 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 1.38x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,550 MHz | 1,560 MHz |
| TDP | 250 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $4,000 | $999 |
| Release | 2023-08-09 | 2021-04-12 |
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA RTX A4000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings