NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 7 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 34.5% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 73% (1.286 vs 2.229 images/min); the closest fight is Z-Image Turbo (16% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation runs 10 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 9, models that don't fit score zero.
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 170.72 | 241.33 | -29% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 103.18 | 157.89 | -35% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 56.66 | 87.51 | -35% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 25.88 | 39.87 | -35% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 18.4 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 12.74 | 10.7 | +19% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 5.925 | 5.1 | +16% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 1.286 | 2.229 | -42% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0.793 | 1.029 | -23% |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is faster on 1 of 6; NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation on 5.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 5.1 min | 5.5 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 1.06x faster |
| 6-panel comic page | 12.8 min | 9.3 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.37x faster |
| Character sheet, 12 poses | 16 min | 12.6 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.27x faster |
| Full codebase review | 17.6 min | 11.4 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.54x faster |
| 40-product photo shoot | 53.7 min | 43 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.25x faster |
| 100-photo restoration batch | 2 h 6 min | 1 h 37 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.29x faster |
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,550 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 250 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $4,000 | $6,799 |
| Release | 2023-08-09 | 2022-12-03 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation or NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 7 of 9 benchmarks in our suite with an average 34.5% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32GB VRAM and a 250W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48GB VRAM and a 300W TDP.
- Does VRAM matter more than speed between NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- For AI, yes, NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation fits 2 more of our 12 workloads than NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
- FLUX.1 dev: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by roughly 73% (1.286 vs 2.229 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings