

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation wins 4 of 10 benchmarks, averaging 24.4% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation leads by 52% (3.58 vs 2.36 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (5% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation runs 111 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 5, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 70.88 | 67.71 | +5% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 43.08 | 35.01 | +23% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 23.35 | 19.76 | +18% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 3.58 | 2.36 | +52% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA T4 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 42.8 min | 50.7 min | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 1.18x faster |
| NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,130 MHz | 1,590 MHz |
| TDP | 70 W | 70 W |
| Launch MSRP | $625 | $2,299 |
| Release | 2024-02-12 | 2018-09-13 |
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation full review · NVIDIA T4 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings