

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell wins 6 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 175.3% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 883% (0.45 vs 4.425 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 32B (26% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 8 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 127.01 | 179.58 | -29% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.68 | 112.36 | -25% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.74 | 60.62 | -23% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 21.98 | 27.8 | -21% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.18 | 8.56 | -28% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0.45 | 4.425 | -90% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0.171 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is faster on 0 of 2; NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell on 2.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.4 min | 16.5 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 1.30x faster |
| 24-frame storyboard | 54.9 min | 6.4 min | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 8.56x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Blackwell |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 2,617 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $9,999 | $1,500 |
| Release | 2018-08-27 | 2025-08-01 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings