

NVIDIA RTX A5000 wins 6 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 162.5% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Z-Image Turbo, where NVIDIA RTX A5000 leads by 800% (0.45 vs 4.05 images/min); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (21% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 8 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 127.01 | 171.68 | -26% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.68 | 119.86 | -29% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.74 | 64.89 | -28% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 21.98 | 30.49 | -28% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.18 | 7.46 | -17% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0.45 | 4.05 | -89% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0.171 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is faster on 0 of 2; NVIDIA RTX A5000 on 2.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.4 min | 15.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A5000 1.39x faster |
| 24-frame storyboard | 54.9 min | 7 min | NVIDIA RTX A5000 7.86x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Ampere (GA102 derivative) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 1,695 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 230 W |
| Launch MSRP | $9,999 | $2,250 |
| Release | 2018-08-27 | 2021-04-12 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · NVIDIA RTX A5000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings