

NVIDIA RTX A4500 wins 4 of 7 benchmarks, averaging 14.2% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA RTX A4500 leads by 18% (84.68 vs 100.2 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (5% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 7 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 127.01 | 148.87 | -15% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.68 | 100.2 | -15% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.74 | 54.29 | -14% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 21.98 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.18 | 6.5 | -5% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0.171 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4500 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.4 min | 18.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A4500 1.16x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Ampere (workstation variant) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 640 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 1,575 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 200 W |
| Launch MSRP | $9,999 | $1,199 |
| Release | 2018-08-27 | 2021-11-23 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · NVIDIA RTX A4500 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings