

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 379.3% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 1204% (0.171 vs 2.229 images/min); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (73% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 127.01 | 241.33 | -47% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.68 | 157.89 | -46% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.74 | 87.51 | -47% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 21.98 | 39.87 | -45% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 18.4 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 6.18 | 10.7 | -42% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 0.45 | 5.1 | -91% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0.171 | 2.229 | -92% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is faster on 0 of 2; NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation on 2.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.4 min | 11.4 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 1.87x faster |
| 24-frame storyboard | 54.9 min | 5.5 min | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 10.05x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 2,505 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 300 W |
| Launch MSRP | $9,999 | $6,799 |
| Release | 2018-08-27 | 2022-12-03 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings