

NVIDIA Titan RTX wins 5 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 23.2% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA Titan RTX leads by 28% (46.54 vs 59.75 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (10% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA Titan RTX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 125.23 | 158.13 | -21% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.21 | 107.39 | -22% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.54 | 59.75 | -22% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 28.36 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.94 | 6.56 | -9% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA Titan RTX on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA Titan RTX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.5 min | 16.7 min | NVIDIA Titan RTX 1.28x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 280 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,300 | $2,499 |
| Release | 2018-08-14 | 2018-12-18 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · NVIDIA Titan RTX full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings