

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) wins 4 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 128.2% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) leads by 152% (5.94 vs 2.36 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (85% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 111 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 125.23 | 67.71 | +85% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.21 | 35.01 | +141% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.54 | 19.76 | +136% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.94 | 2.36 | +152% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA T4 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA T4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.5 min | 50.7 min | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) 2.36x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Turing |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 1,590 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 70 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,300 | $2,299 |
| Release | 2018-08-14 | 2018-09-13 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · NVIDIA T4 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings