

NVIDIA RTX A5000 wins 5 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 36.1% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA RTX A5000 leads by 42% (84.21 vs 119.86 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (26% apart).
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 125.23 | 171.68 | -27% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 84.21 | 119.86 | -30% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 46.54 | 64.89 | -28% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 30.49 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.94 | 7.46 | -20% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A5000 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 21.5 min | 15.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A5000 1.39x faster |
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Turing (TU102) | Ampere (GA102 derivative) |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 1,695 MHz |
| TDP | 260 W | 230 W |
| Launch MSRP | $6,300 | $2,250 |
| Release | 2018-08-14 | 2021-04-12 |
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · NVIDIA RTX A5000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings