NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation, AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 wins 4 of 14 benchmarks, averaging 47.3% faster.
Both cards' numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder-14B, where NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 leads by 76% (41.11 vs 23.35 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (14% apart).
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 118.26 | 70.88 | +67% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 73.61 | 43.08 | +71% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 41.11 | 23.35 | +76% |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 30B A3B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Gemma 4 31B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 3.14 | 3.58 | -12% |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| LTX-Video (distilled) frames/s | 1.88 | 1.39 | +35% |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 24.4 min | 42.8 min | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 1.76x faster |
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| Transistors | 13,600M | 18,900M |
| Die size | 545 mm² | 158.7 mm² |
| Process node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor density | 25 M/mm² | 119.1 M/mm² |
| Architecture | Turing (TU104) | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,770 MHz | 2,130 MHz |
| TDP | 230 W | 70 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,299 | $625 |
| Release | 2018-08-14 | 2024-02-12 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 or NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 4 of 14 benchmarks in our suite with an average 47.3% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation?
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16GB VRAM and a 230W TDP, while NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16GB VRAM and a 70W TDP.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation?
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 leads by roughly 76% (41.11 vs 23.35 tok/s) in our testing.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 full review · NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings