NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing), AI & Machine Learning Comparison
NVIDIA L40S wins 9 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 94.3% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
What the numbers say
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA L40S leads by 187% (17.02 vs 5.94 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen2.5-Coder-14B (60% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 152 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
Benchmark results head-to-head
| Benchmark | NVIDIA L40S | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 212.05 | 125.23 | +69% |
| Llama-3.1-8B tok/s | 135.51 | 84.21 | +61% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder-14B tok/s | 74.6 | 46.54 | +60% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 34.44 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama-3.3-70B tok/s | 16.49 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 17.02 | 5.94 | +187% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 3.836 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 1.693 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 1.06 | 0 | n/a |
Whole-job comparison
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA L40S is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA L40S | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 13.5 min | 21.5 min | NVIDIA L40S 1.60x faster |
Specifications compared
| NVIDIA L40S | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 48GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,520 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 350 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $7,500 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2023-08-08 | 2018-08-14 |
FAQ
- Which is better for ai & machine learning: NVIDIA L40S or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- NVIDIA L40S performs better for ai & machine learning, winning 9 of 9 benchmarks in our suite with an average 94.3% advantage.
- What are the main hardware differences between NVIDIA L40S and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- NVIDIA L40S has 48GB VRAM and a 350W TDP, while NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) has 24GB VRAM and a 260W TDP.
- Does VRAM matter more than speed between NVIDIA L40S and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- For AI, yes, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) fits 4 more of our 12 workloads than NVIDIA L40S. A model that exceeds VRAM doesn't run slower, it doesn't run at all, so the card that fits the model wins that workload outright.
- Where is the biggest performance difference between NVIDIA L40S and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)?
- Stable Diffusion XL: NVIDIA L40S leads by roughly 187% (17.02 vs 5.94 images/min) in our testing.
NVIDIA L40S full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings