

NVIDIA RTX A4500 wins 5 of 10 benchmarks, averaging 67.8% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Llama 3.1 8B, where NVIDIA RTX A4500 leads by 99% (50.45 vs 100.2 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (25% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX A4500 runs 138 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 6, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 84 | 148.87 | -44% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 50.45 | 100.2 | -50% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 27.46 | 54.29 | -49% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 12.42 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.18 | 6.5 | -20% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.15 | 0.21 | -29% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA L4 is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4500 on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 36.4 min | 18.4 min | NVIDIA RTX A4500 1.98x faster | $0.267 vs $0.058 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX A4500 finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA L4 | $0.440 |
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 | $0.190 |
NVIDIA RTX A4500 is 2.32x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 20GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere (workstation variant) |
| Memory bandwidth | 300 GB/s | 640 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,040 MHz | 1,575 MHz |
| TDP | 72 W | 200 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,500 | $1,199 |
| Release | 2023-03-21 | 2021-11-23 |
NVIDIA L4 full review · NVIDIA RTX A4500 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings