

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation wins 9 of 11 benchmarks, averaging 117.3% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 146% (5.18 vs 12.74 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3-4B (103% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation runs 138 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 10, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 84 | 170.72 | -51% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 50.45 | 103.18 | -51% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 27.46 | 56.66 | -52% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 12.42 | 25.88 | -52% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.18 | 12.74 | -59% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 2.475 | 5.925 | -58% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 1.286 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0.793 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 0.15 | 0.32 | -53% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA L4 is faster on 0 of 3; NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation on 3.
| Workflow | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 12.2 min | 5.1 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 2.37x faster |
| Full codebase review | 36.4 min | 17.6 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 2.06x faster |
| 10 short social clips | 60.3 min | 27.9 min | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 2.16x faster |
| NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 32GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Memory bandwidth | 300 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,040 MHz | 2,550 MHz |
| TDP | 72 W | 250 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,500 | $4,000 |
| Release | 2023-03-21 | 2023-08-09 |
NVIDIA L4 full review · NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings