

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) wins 4 of 9 benchmarks, averaging 50% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing)'s numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, where NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) leads by 69% (27.46 vs 46.54 tok/s); the closest fight is Stable Diffusion XL (15% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) runs 138 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-4B tok/s | 84 | 125.23 | -33% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 50.45 | 84.21 | -40% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 27.46 | 46.54 | -41% |
| Qwen3-32B tok/s | 12.42 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 5.18 | 5.94 | -13% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 0 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA L4 is faster on 0 of 1; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) on 1.
| Workflow | NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 36.4 min | 21.5 min | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) 1.69x faster |
| NVIDIA L4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 24GB | 24GB |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 300 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 2,040 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 72 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $2,500 | $6,300 |
| Release | 2023-03-21 | 2018-08-14 |
NVIDIA L4 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 (Turing) full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings