

NVIDIA H200 wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 1692.7% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA H200 leads by 5464% (9.514 vs 0.171 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (151% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 150 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA H200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 318.84 | 127.01 | +151% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 268.31 | 84.68 | +217% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 148.43 | 46.74 | +218% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 76.58 | 21.98 | +248% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 42.66 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 37.16 | 6.18 | +501% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 23.175 | 0.45 | +5050% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 9.514 | 0.171 | +5464% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA H200 is faster on 2 of 2; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA H200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 3.9 min | 54.9 min | NVIDIA H200 14.05x faster |
| Full codebase review | 6.7 min | 21.4 min | NVIDIA H200 3.18x faster |
| NVIDIA H200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 141GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Hopper | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 4800 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | 1,980 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 700 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $31,000 | $9,999 |
| Release | 2024-03-18 | 2018-08-27 |
NVIDIA H200 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings