

NVIDIA B200 wins 10 of 10 benchmarks, averaging 371% faster.
Both cards were measured first-party on our bench, same suite, same test rig.
The gap is widest in Stable Diffusion XL, where NVIDIA B200 leads by 780% (46.12 vs 5.24 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (174% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA B200 runs 145 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 4, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 317.93 | 116.23 | +174% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 274.41 | 75.52 | +263% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 150.96 | 41.13 | +267% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 78.56 | 0 | n/a |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 44.54 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 46.12 | 5.24 | +780% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 13.136 | 0 | n/a |
| FLUX.1 Kontext dev images/min | 5.721 | 0 | n/a |
| Qwen-Image-Edit images/min | 4.86 | 0 | n/a |
| Wan 2.2 5B (720p) frames/s | 1.88 | 0 | n/a |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA B200 is faster on 1 of 1; NVIDIA RTX A4000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | Difference | Cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full codebase review | 6.6 min | 24.3 min | NVIDIA B200 3.67x faster | $0.660 vs $0.069 |
Renting by the hour, NVIDIA RTX A4000 finishes 1 of 1 cheaper. The quicker card is not automatically the cheaper way to get the work done.
| Card | Per hour |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 | $5.980 |
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | $0.170 |
NVIDIA RTX A4000 is 35.18x cheaper per hour. Cheapest on-demand rate we see across RunPod and Vast.
| NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 192GB | 16GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Ampere |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 TB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Boost clock | n/a | 1,560 MHz |
| TDP | 1000 W | 140 W |
| Launch MSRP | $40,000 | $999 |
| Release | 2025-02-01 | 2021-04-12 |
NVIDIA B200 full review · NVIDIA RTX A4000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings