

NVIDIA B200 wins 8 of 8 benchmarks, averaging 2309.5% faster.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000's numbers are anchored estimates calibrated against our measured cards, pending first-party measurement. Treat small gaps as ties.
The gap is widest in FLUX.1 dev, where NVIDIA B200 leads by 7582% (13.136 vs 0.171 images/min); the closest fight is Qwen3 4B (150% apart); VRAM decides part of this one: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 runs 145 of our 12 AI workloads while the other card runs 7, models that don't fit score zero.
| Benchmark | NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 4B tok/s | 317.93 | 127.01 | +150% |
| Llama 3.1 8B tok/s | 274.41 | 84.68 | +224% |
| Qwen2.5-Coder 14B tok/s | 150.96 | 46.74 | +223% |
| Qwen3 32B tok/s | 78.56 | 21.98 | +257% |
| Llama 3.3 70B tok/s | 44.54 | 0 | n/a |
| Stable Diffusion XL images/min | 46.12 | 6.18 | +646% |
| Z-Image Turbo images/min | 32.325 | 0.45 | +7083% |
| FLUX.1 dev images/min | 13.136 | 0.171 | +7582% |
How long each card takes to finish a complete pipeline, not just one model. NVIDIA B200 is faster on 2 of 2; NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on 0.
| Workflow | NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-frame storyboard | 89 s | 54.9 min | NVIDIA B200 36.84x faster |
| Full codebase review | 6.6 min | 21.4 min | NVIDIA B200 3.23x faster |
| NVIDIA B200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 192GB | 48GB |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Turing (TU102) |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 TB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Boost clock | n/a | 1,770 MHz |
| TDP | 1000 W | 260 W |
| Launch MSRP | $40,000 | $9,999 |
| Release | 2025-02-01 | 2018-08-27 |
NVIDIA B200 full review · NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 full review · All AI & Machine Learning rankings